WickedEye's Quotient

3/26/2015 at 23:50

Hope & Grief (or, Thank you, Mr. Nimoy.)

When Leonard Nimoy died, I could not comment...could not write at all. The loss went too deep; the space he left was so full of things I had never examined. Having now gazed into that space, I think that the very last of my childhood may have gone with him.

I am 40 years old. In some way or another, Star Trek has shaped my thinking since I was a child.

And it was Spock—of course it was—who caught my attention. I was painfully shy, awkward, ignorant of much of the cultural idiom; highly intelligent, an academic achiever who never understood the jokes or references my classmates made; always too serious. 

Always too literal. Too logical. 

Of course I identified with the half-Vulcan aboard the Enterprise. I too struggled with my humanity, with my day-to-day existence in an environment both bewildering and full of threats, amongst rules I could not control and barely understood. Spock's camaraderie with his companions in the face of all these things, their sense of shared danger and adventure and goals, was as mysterious and dazzling to me as an oasis amidst their planet's bare rock and sand would be to a Vulcan.

Spock represented something better than the flawed, violent, alienating world around me. And as I grew, all of Starfleet came to represent that alternative as well, far more so than Star Wars' urgings toward self-awareness (self-awareness had never been my problem). 

Starfleet's quest to discover, to understand, to explore without destroying, resonated deep within my 12-year-old soul. Here were people who did not think all difference was dangerous. Here were people who were strong, and instead of belittling or mocking or trying to destroy those who looked and behaved differently, they used their strength to learn from and benefit those they encountered.

Star Trek TNG accompanied me throughout my teens and early twenties, a font of intelligent, actively curious benevolence of a kind that was seldom found in the increasingly adult world I was trying to occupy. I had figured out the jokes, developed a sense of humor, become fluent in the cultural idiom, but still it was Spock to whom I turned—though it was his Vulcan traits which now fascinated me.
He bent emotion to serve reason, a still point in the churning frenzy of the Enterprise's ventures—at rest, yet never inert. Complex, responsive, rational. The best kind of human...and it was being half-Vulcan that made him so. The message was clear: We can evolve into beings greater than the sum of our parts. Feeling, or even being, alienated matters less than determination, than intelligence, than logic, than compassion.

I filled my 30s with a mix of Trekker and Trekkie movies, as well as TNG and TOS. Unquestionably the Federation shaped, and continues to shape, my ideals of a world(s) that is just, equitable, humane—of a society benevolent to all its inhabitants, both old and new. 

I watched Abrams' new Trek films as I neared 40, eager to embrace the newest iteration of a world and character that shaped my youth; there was much in them to enjoy. But, with the exception of Zach Quinto's acting (though of course I miss the original Spock), most of what I like about the new films has little to do with what I love about Star Trek. 

Abrams' Trek is space opera in the tradition of Star Wars: Most aliens not aboard the Enterprise are enemies or hostile; running, fighting, and overt emotion rule the day. The only characters who fully embrace rules and logic are scolding teachers who are disregarded, or villains who are later annihilated.

This is not surprising. Abrams has said, more than once, that he'd never before watched Star Trek—and didn't 'get' it once he had.

The intelligence, the wonder, the curiosity and reasoning—and the human emotions which drive these things, including fear—are largely missing from the brave new world. The things which gave me hope that the adult world could be more than what I experienced as a child, that helped me navigate it as I grew, that gave me hope and faith that we, that humans, could be better—could meet without disguise, and know each other, and come away wiser and more fully ourselves from the experience—these are missing. 

The new Star Trek has great production values, fight scenes, backstory—but for me, much of the warmth and wonder are gone from the adventure.

It may not matter. I am no longer a child. I have not been for a long time—since long before I knew what Star Trek was. My youth was not a place which forgave innocence. But this kind of realization—this loss of warmth and wonder—is a cold greeting even for middle age. I wonder if I am not letting Spock down by it. 

For I know that for all the reasoning underpinning my grief, Mr. Spock would indeed most likely say that I am being illogical. That all things change, including ourselves. That wisdom lies in learning continually, in shaping and choosing our own changes as we grow. That those things cannot happen in the absence of hope.

And perhaps it says more than anything I've written above that knowing what Spock would say is enough to square my shoulders and turn my gaze forward to the next 30 years. 

(Thank you, Mr. Nimoy. For all of this, for hope and grief alike—because for me the Trek wears your face, and always will.)

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

at 23:25


My friend Drew commented on the "Sodomite Suppression Act" ballot initiative, which proposes to legalize the murder of LGBT people in California—how terrifying the detached rhetoric surrounding it was; how people were ignoring its violent insanity. This was my response.

I really do get how you feel about this, Drew, because I lived through 9/11 in the South looking as I do, and at the time was married to a dark-skinned 'furriner' with a perceptible accent on top of it. The idea that people all around you hate you and want to kill you for something you can't help—hearing, for example, a whole grocery store go quiet as you and your husband walk in, and talk restart in whispers all around you, and enduring this again and again and again, everywhere—the idea that the people around you are only barely restrained from violence by the law, is terrifying on a visceral level. It was also inescapable. There was no getting around it, day or night, and nowhere safe to go.

In the face of that kind of hatred, the "let cooler heads prevail" attitude gets me hot under the collar too. "Cooler heads"? Is this some kind of 21st-century idiom for "sane people"? 

After having read the proposal, I used the word 'psychotic' advisedly—this homicidal cretin is a full-bore, rubber-room-renting, delusional psychopath, and he and his psychotic Sodom and Gomorrah fantasies belong in an institution which also houses people who (to quote Lewis Black) are crocheting something that isn't there.

We as a society are lucky he raised red flags with this paperwork, instead of simply (!) turning into a serial killer.

And to be clear, I think the same thing of all of the people you just described who stopped and thought about this before deciding it "went too far." They may not be actively psychotic, but they are delusional or stupid or unbalanced or (probably) all three. Countenancing, even for an instant, the idea of serial murder of people because you don't like them makes you creepy and not fit for decent society and not sharing the same reality as the rest of us...and that's not really a hard diagnosis to make. 

What concerns me is that, because this man expressed his sociopathy through a religious ballot proposal, people fail to see how terrifyingly insane it is. Then again, people with a milder flavor of the same sociopathy are now protected in Indiana; instead of being barred from behavior that is antisocial and irrational, their antisocial, delusional behavior is being actively encouraged. 

It's all part of the same mindset—and it's terrifying that sane people across the country are failing so utterly to see insanity when it's shrieking, spittle flying, into their faces.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs2.5 License.